← Search

Allison Eckelkamp

Collierville, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 48W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Allison Eckelkamp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
Meg Smith / Heather Umsted
2026-09-09 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tiffany Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
Emily Koelsch / Margaret Johnson
2026-08-29 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jean Ellen Sisson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tiffany Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Libby Nabors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicci Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · Campbell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cait Shirilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-15 · Campbell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Spann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-02 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-07 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Toms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-06 · Campbell/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.8% of games
3.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 56% of games
3.5
63.9%
23W–13L · 57.5% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 50.8% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#1 Singles
13%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
10%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert