← Search

Laurence Isaacs

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 48W–88L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Laurence Isaacs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
W
2026-08-30 · CMoffitt.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with NIKHIL PASULA
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-29 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luc Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-22 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ryan Sayko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-21 · CMoffitt.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with NIKHIL PASULA
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Alec Bergeron / Michael Young
2026-08-15 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Raymond Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · CMoffitt.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Richard Millard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · JLundberg-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stewart Bible
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-28 · RGoff-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sameer Cheema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · RGoff-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
Michael Young / Juan Andrade
2026-03-30 · RGoff-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · RGoff-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Albright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-22 · RGoff-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeron Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
45.5%
20W–24L · 49.2% of games
4.5
27.6%
8W–21L · 39.7% of games
7.5
50%
6W–6L · 51.4% of games
8.5
24.2%
8W–25L · 43.4% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
31 matches
#3 Singles
8%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe