← Search

Madison Walz

Westminster, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 34W–18L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Madison Walz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-08-16 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jay Rockeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jay Rockeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Hartwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with John Richards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · RCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Hefter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-10 · RCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Chase mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · RCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenna Baesler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · RCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Juan Sarti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirsten Hefter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-30 · RCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Hefter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-28 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirsten Hefter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · with Kirsten Hefter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 61.7% of games
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 64.2% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 59.9% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe