← Search

Michelle Hackett

— year-end
39 matches · 24W–15L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Michelle Hackett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Evans/IS/Day3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Fincher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-21 · Orange/Rackleff/IS 18s 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-02 · Orange/Rackleff/IS 18s 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaclyn Herthneck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-04-22 · Hayes/IS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-15 · Poole/IS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Rackleff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-04-10 · Hayes/IS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Berglund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-11 · 2: Hayes/IS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Rackleff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-10-28 · 2: Hayes/IS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meagan Jacobs-Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-10-22 · Blue 2: Doyle/IS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-10-21 · 2: Hayes/IS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Rackleff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-09-23 · 2: Hayes/IS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Rackleff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-09-18 · Blue 2: Doyle/IS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Epperly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
70%
21W–9L · 59.7% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert