Linda Peterson
170 matches · 82W–88L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Linda Peterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history170 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.7% of games
3.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 62.3% of games
3.5
38%
27W–44L · 48.5% of games
6.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 58.5% of games
7.0
44.1%
15W–19L · 48% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
53 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.