← Search

Christine Mendoza

Collierville, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 48W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Christine Mendoza to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Bratton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-29 · Bratton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna Wolfanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · Picha/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Virginia Palacio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-08 · Picha/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Stolnicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Stephanie Wright / Samantha Towne
2026-06-24 · Flesch/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Grillis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Lacy/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Horn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Theresa Carayiannis / Stephanie Wright
2026-05-02 · Hurt/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Horn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · Mendoza/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Xiaoqun Akers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · Hurt/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Ware
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-22 · Lacy/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Durham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-5
W
2026-04-12 · Mendoza/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Durham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-11 · Hurt/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Horn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
72.7%
32W–12L · 60.6% of games
3.5
14.3%
3W–18L · 39.8% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.6% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 58% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
10 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova