← Search

Christa McGill

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 119W–124L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christa McGill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history243 matches
L
2026-09-10 · MDaubert-DFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-01 · SBrock.7.5C-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frances Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-28 · VArne-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Spinarski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · MDaubert-DFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · SBrock.7.5C-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sophie Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · VArne-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-20 · MDaubert-DFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adriana Doi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · SBrock.7.5C-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frances Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-29 · Post-Rust/McGill-DFC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Fuguet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · Post-Rust/McGill-DFC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Fuguet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-10 · VArne-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dayna Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-01 · VArne-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vicky Arne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
51%
75W–72L · 50% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
47.3%
35W–39L · 50% of games
4.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
68 matches
#1 Singles
26%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
48 matches
#2 Singles
14%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
27 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams