← Search

Nagako Kikuchi

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 56W–20L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Nagako Kikuchi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
Katherine Jeske / Emily Johnson
2026-09-09 · TOC.Otsuka · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tonia Laflamme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-09-02 · TOC.Otsuka · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathryn Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · TOC.Otsuka · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · TOC.Otsuka · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yuko Resseguie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-04 · TOC.Armstrong · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ayako Otsuka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-30 · TOC.Otsuka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Grau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · TOC.Otsuka · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keiko Fukuzawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · TOC.Otsuka · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aki Yamatani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · NMAC.Kuzma · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Stocking
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-23 · TOC.Armstrong · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mallory Biringer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-19 · NMAC.Kuzma · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keiko Fukuzawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · with Saiko Hiyama championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 88.9% of games
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 54.4% of games
4.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.3% of games
5.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 67.6% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 69% of games
6.5
100%
8W–0L · 74.6% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer