← Search

Abigail Runner

Pittsford, NY
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
20 matches · 17W–3L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Abigail Runner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
W
2026-07-31 · Midtown · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Mandy Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · Midtown · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Mandy Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-05 · Midtown · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Mandy Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · Sweet Spots · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly Napier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · Sweet Spots · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary-Beth Rumble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · Sweet Spots · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Veenema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-02-22 · Sweet Spots · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Veenema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
Grace Williams / Katie Wilmot
2025-07-21 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Blaire Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-4
L
2025-05-17 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Sayers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-04-27 · ROC: Sweet Spots · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Sayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-02-23 · ROC: Sweet Spots · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Ponce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-02-16 · ROC: Sweet Spots · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Sayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
100%
6W–0L · 70.5% of games
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.2% of games
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
20%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
10%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova