← Search

Randi Mullaney

— year-end
93 matches · 48W–45L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Randi Mullaney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Carla Higgins / Debbie Bryant
2026-09-01 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Boucher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Jamie Harris / Lisa McIntosh
2026-08-26 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gina Throckmorton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Corrigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · Wittke/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Foreman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · Babcock/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Foreman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · Babcock/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · Babcock/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Wittke/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Foreman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · Wittke/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Charping
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Wittke/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Foreman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
54.2%
39W–33L · 52.3% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.4% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.8% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams