← Search

Mark Tindall

Annapolis, MD
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 22W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mark Tindall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
W
2026-07-27 · Atom Smashers 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Nottrott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Neal Nottrott championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Atom Smashers 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Sybert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · Atom Smashers 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-06-14 · Wagner · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christy Dupras mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · Koch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Sybert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · Atom Smashers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Nottrott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · Koch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Ritter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-17 · Atom Smashers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Santiago Rubiano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · Atom Smashers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Nottrott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · Koch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Willard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-22 · Koch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Flynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 50.8% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 42.2% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 82.8% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.3% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer