← Search

Laura Cox

— year-end
127 matches · 88W–39L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Laura Cox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-09-02 · St.Luther40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dana Rawls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · St.Luther40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · St.Luther40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · Ja.Martin18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · St.Luther40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · Ja.Martin18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · Ja.Martin18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-3
W
2026-07-12 · La.Fye18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Uhland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · La.Cox18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · La.Fye18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Wandor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-0
W
2026-06-25 · La.Cox18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Breckenridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · La.Cox18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 70.1% of games
3.0
92%
23W–2L · 71.3% of games
3.5
67.3%
33W–16L · 57.1% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 44.8% of games
6.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 64% of games
7.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 55.9% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
23 matches
#1 Singles
13%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert