← Search

Hitoshi Kiyokawa

New York, NY
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 11W–4L · seasons 2024–2024

Captains: add Hitoshi Kiyokawa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
W
2024-07-17 · Rader/Lee · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-07-11 · Rader/Lee · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-07-01 · Lee/Rader · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Damian Zunino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-05-28 · Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hisao Takahashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-1
L
2024-05-18 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Laderman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2024-05-08 · Bhagwagar · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Nikita Kudla / Mike Smith
2024-04-24 · Lee/Rader · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephane Aknin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2024-04-21 · Bhagwagar/Lee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Rabinovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-04-10 · Bhagwagar/McHugh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Larsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-04-09 · Lee/Theise · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melody Peng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-03-27 · Bhagwagar/Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with JEHAN BHAGWAGAR
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-03-24 · Lee/Theise · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacqueline Vazquez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2024–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
8 matches
#1 Singles
20%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova