← Search

Helene Firoglanis

Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 40W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Helene Firoglanis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-08-01 · Hempfield Topspin Theory - Eberts · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · Hempfield Topspin Theory - Eberts · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-10 · RCW Positive Spin - Medini · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · RCW Positive Spin - Medini · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie DiPerna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · RCW Positive Spin - Medini · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-26 · Hempfield - HangNimm · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gretchen Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-12-01 · Hempfield - HangNimm · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with JoAnne Hangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-13 · Hempfield - Clay · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-11-10 · Hempfield - HangNimm · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JoAnne Hangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-27 · Hempfield - HangNimm · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JoAnne Hangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 75.9% of games
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 72.3% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
75%
12W–4L · 66.3% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#1 Singles
26%
13 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova