← Search

Mary Wilkes Yonchak

— year-end
25 matches · 11W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mary Wilkes Yonchak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Conrad/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennie Dill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-05 · Thompson/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Ohrberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · Walsh/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Horn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · Walsh/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-13 · Thompson/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Sadlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-22 · Walsh/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sydney Tomes Steffner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-19 · Thompson/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-05 · Witte/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laura Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-04 · Witte/Memphis · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-10-29 · Witte/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Gilbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-21 · Witte/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anne von Lanken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 53.7% of games
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.9% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova