← Search

Rachel Fogg

— year-end
16 matches · 11W–5L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rachel Fogg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Hagood7.5/META · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Guillemette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · MUKHERJEE-EWING/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Clemons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · MUKHERJEE-EWING/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Wenzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · MUKHERJEE-EWING/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacquelyn Wondergem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacquelyn Wondergem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · Cox/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Wenzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacquelyn Wondergem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-03-29 · Lovelace/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Nobles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-09-28 · Zhang7.5/META · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jean Swindle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-09-14 · Zhang7.5/META · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alice Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-08-31 · Zhang7.5/META · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Guillemette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 61.6% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.8% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova