← Search

Paige Oostdyk

North Chesterfield, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 62W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Paige Oostdyk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Belmont Stewart · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lila LaCroix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · Belmont -Colgin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liesl Delisio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Belmont Stewart · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Bradt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · Belmont -Colgin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Riester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-27 · Belmont Stewart · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lila LaCroix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · Belmont Stewart · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Riester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · 1 ACAC DELISIO · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liesl Delisio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · 1 ACAC DELISIO · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liesl Delisio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · 10S Bradts/ACAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · 10S Bradts/ACAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-6
L
2026-04-18 · 10S Bradts/ACAC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Bradt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-26 · 1 Belmont Stewart · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
50%
31W–31L · 50.5% of games
8.0
64%
16W–9L · 51.9% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 60.6% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
33 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova