← Search

Colleen Verch

Waterford, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 85W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Colleen Verch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Carol Forman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Carol Forman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · DEER-Carlson 40s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Forman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Kristin Dalessandro / Elizabeth Hoff
2026-07-14 · BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · DEER-Carlson 40s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Forman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Forman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · DEER-Carlson 40s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Forman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-04 · DEER-Carlson 40s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Forman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-02 · BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Thieme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-26 · BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Forman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
52.3%
69W–63L · 52.5% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.2% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
5W–5L · 53.2% of games
8.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#2 Singles
10%
17 matches
#1 Singles
7%
12 matches
#3 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams