← Search

Cindy Bluml

Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
252 matches · 136W–116L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cindy Bluml to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history252 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Jorgensen · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicolette Diamantis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-09-02 · Jorgensen · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Maxine Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · Sambol · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maxine Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · Sambol · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maxine Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · Sambol · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maxine Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maxine Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-05 · NE/Martin/65 and over 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-06-04 · NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kay Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · NE/Martin/65 and over 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Crook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · Sambol · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacquie Dierks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-26 · NE/Martin/65 and over 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maxine Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-12 · NE/Martin/65 and over 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Crook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 47.8% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 54.1% of games
4.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 48.3% of games
7.0
52.6%
30W–27L · 53.5% of games
8.0
55.4%
87W–70L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
91 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
70 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert