← Search

Rajesh Padmanabhan

— year-end
99 matches · 46W–53L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Rajesh Padmanabhan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Chin 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark van Leuven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-22 · Tacos After · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Chin 40+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krishna Vasireddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-15 · Tacos After · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Dennin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · Chin 40+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Henning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-09 · Chin 40+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ravi Yaligar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · Tacos After · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Stoffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Tacos After · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Kayser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Tacos After · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · Chin 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave Netoskie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-03 · Tacos After · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Stoffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · Tacos After · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.6% of games
4.0
38.9%
21W–33L · 45.9% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 47.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert