← Search

Kim Osgood

— year-end
50 matches · 11W–39L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Kim Osgood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2023-01-14 · Henning · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Angle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-01-07 · Henning · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Henning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-12-03 · Henning · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Axford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-11-05 · Henning · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis McGuire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Paul Warren / Muhammad Khan
2022-07-23 · Chin 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Hood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2022-06-15 · Chin 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Hood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2022-06-11 · Chin 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Paultre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Paul Warren / Jason Horth
2022-04-30 · Chin 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-04-24 · Chin 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Henning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2022-03-06 · Chin 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2021-09-05 · Bologna 8.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Glenda Kelman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2021-07-20 · Northern: Cary 55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Angle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Teams10 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 42.8% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 40.5% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 37% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert