← Search

Catherine Feole

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 3W–8L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Catherine Feole to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
W
2026-04-19 · TOC.Spinarski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · TOC.Spinarski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Millikan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Jorgelina Stroud / Stephanie Lee
2026-03-08 · TOC.Spinarski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-02-24 · 10-EBrown-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-04-19 · 6-KWalton-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-12 · 6-KWalton-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahid Vrana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-09 · 6-KWalton-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mel Huey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Stacey Burkert / Mollie Williams
2022-04-05 · 6-KWalton-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katharine Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Jeanne Beckley / Brook Holton Sheahan
2022-02-22 · 6-KWalton-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Tiemann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
Marybeth Evers / Deborah Howard
2021-10-05 · *3 EKWA Morning Stars · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Tiemann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2021-09-16 · *3 EKWA Morning Stars · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Tiemann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 17.8% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 55% of the time
#2 Doubles
55%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova