← Search

Carol Griffith

Tulsa, OK
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 48W–47L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Carol Griffith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Griffith/LF/Day4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sharon Anthamatten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-11 · OK/Willis/55&over9.0 W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sara Delgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Melissa Clark / Kelly Roark
2026-03-28 · OK/Willis/55&over9.0 W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-09 · Anthamatten/LF/4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Galles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-11 · Anthamatten/LF/4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Galles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-29 · Anthamatten/LF/4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sharon Anthamatten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-09-09 · Anthamatten/LF/4.5W · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Allman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-21 · Gillock 8.0/PH · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheilah Bright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-14 · Gillock 8.0/PH · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Palik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-10 · Gillock 8.0/PH · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Theresa Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-16 · Gillock 8.0/PH · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beth Latham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-31 · Gillock 8.0/PH · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheilah Bright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
47.2%
25W–28L · 51.4% of games
8.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 49.3% of games
9.0
75%
9W–3L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams