← Search

Joshua Fields

— year-end
40 matches · 15W–25L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Joshua Fields to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2025-03-02 · Worth a tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Fishman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
James Axford / Alexander Rouyer
2025-02-22 · Worth a tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donghyeon Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-02-15 · Worth a tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Albaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-02-01 · Worth a tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave Netoskie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-06-26 · Clockwork Angels - 4.0 - 18+ · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2024-06-19 · Clockwork Angels - 4.0 - 18+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-05-29 · Clockwork Angels - 4.0 - 18+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Paultre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-08 · Clockwork Angels - 4.0 - 18+ · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2023-12-10 · Northern: Amico · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roberto Paladini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2023-12-03 · Northern: Amico · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carter Flanigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-10-21 · Northern: Amico · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Axford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2023-07-30 · Northern: Roll the Bones 18+ · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams9 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.1% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 51.1% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#1 Singles
18%
7 matches
#2 Singles
13%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova