← Search

Carrie Corbett

Cedar Rapids, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 23W–33L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Carrie Corbett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-03-29 · Thompson-Oster/Wasta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caren Wasta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-07 · Cobb & Trovas: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shari Konarske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-03 · Kemmerer & Novak: Smithfield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Whitham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-12-07 · Patten/Wasta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daryl Patten mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-23 · Thompson-Oster/Wasta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Netolicky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
Ann Brown / Muhannad Abu Nameh
2025-11-09 · Patten/Wasta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Eddington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-17 · Thompson-Oster/Wasta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-10-05 · Thompson-Oster/Wasta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Engle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-09-26 · Patten/Wasta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Eddington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-13 · Kemmerer & Novak: Smithfield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Whitham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-27 · Thompson-Oster · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Netolicky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-03-09 · Hurn/Sherman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caren Wasta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
64%
16W–9L · 57.6% of games
7.0
33.3%
7W–14L · 43.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 20% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 35.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova