← Search

Tillie Terzakis

— year-end
142 matches · 72W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tillie Terzakis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
L
2026-01-04 · SRTC Hovanec · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Wager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-12-19 · SRTC Culley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-11-23 · SRTC Hovanec · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Wager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Annette Ross-Gray / Diana Ferguson
2025-11-21 · SRTC Culley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-12 · SRTC Culley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-03 · SRTC Culley · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-09-28 · SRTC Hovanec · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Blum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-09 · SRTC Culley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-14 · SRTC Culley · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Kelsey Schuering / Emily Turner
2025-06-01 · SRTC Miller · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Hovanec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-02 · SRTC Fahrenholz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Humphreville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-05-02 · SRTC Culley · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Blum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-3
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
39W–39L · 49.7% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.2% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
59.1%
26W–18L · 52.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 23.4% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams