← Search

Linda Case

— year-end
81 matches · 33W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Case to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-06-07 · Wedel, Nancy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jackie Gehrke / Linda Johnson
2026-04-12 · Griffey, Jacque · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brook Vitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-04 · Wedel, Nancy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Byers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-06 · Wedel, Nancy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-20 · Wedel, Nancy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Schwerdtfeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 0-1
W
2026-02-06 · Wedel, Nancy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Byers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-07 · Wedel, Nancy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Chisholm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-26 · Wedel, Nancy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brook Vitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-05-10 · Griffey, Jacque · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacqui Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-05 · Griffey, Jacque · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia Eaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-14 · Wedel, Nancy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Schwerdtfeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-03-07 · Wedel, Nancy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brook Vitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams50 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 61.5% of games
4.5
17.6%
6W–28L · 39.3% of games
8.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.4% of games
9.0
0%
0W–5L · 31% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova