← Search

Joanne Connelly

California, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 42W–59L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Joanne Connelly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-06-21 · Wagner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Leihy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · Wagner · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Leihy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · Bailey · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Grula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-05 · Martin 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-03 · Bailey · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elaine Kitano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · Wagner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stewart Royals mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · Bailey · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Grula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · Martin 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Alwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Martin 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Caddeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · Bailey · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Grula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-15 · Martin 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Caddeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-29 · Caddeo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Tacka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
90%
9W–1L · 66.9% of games
4.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 49.9% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 25% of games
7.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.9% of games
8.5
20%
1W–4L · 43.8% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
31.4%
11W–24L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer