← Search

Dan Kane

Powder Springs, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 5W–15L · seasons 2022–2025

Captains: add Dan Kane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
L
2025-04-21 · RGriffin-ENO · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-05 · RGriffin-ENO · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-2
L
2025-03-29 · RGriffin-ENO · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-22 · RGriffin-ENO · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-03-15 · RGriffin-ENO · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-03-07 · RGriffin-ENO · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-03-01 · RGriffin-ENO · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-01 · RGriffin-ENO · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-08-15 · DVyas-ENO · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jack Hu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-05-29 · MCSP.Vyas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Muller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-10 · *8-DVyas-Eno · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-13 · TOC.Kane · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 17.2% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 23.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King