← Search

Christopher Frederick

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 84W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Christopher Frederick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
L
2026-08-30 · MD.Riddick · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Todd Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-23 · MD.Riddick · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Henry Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-09 · MD.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Owen McGrew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · MD.Jennings · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · MD.Jennings · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Chris Culver / Tevin Wilson
2026-05-19 · MD.Jennings · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason High
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · MD.Riddick · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason High
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-03 · MD.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Moriarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-12 · MD.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Riddick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-29 · MD.Riddick · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
Scott Anderson / Mike Gaul
2026-03-15 · MD.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Podrasky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-11 · RGoff-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurence Isaacs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 78.4% of games
3.5
82.9%
29W–6L · 63.8% of games
4.0
52.5%
21W–19L · 49.1% of games
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 71.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 60.4% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 65.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe