← Search

Catherine Reinmiller

Kansas City, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 29W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Reinmiller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-06-03 · Paul, Jayme · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jayme Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-12-07 · Paul, Jayme · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Dittmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-16 · Paul, Jayme · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda DePalma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-02 · Paul, Jayme · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-10-12 · Paul, Jayme · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerstin Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-2
L
2025-06-04 · Paul, Jayme · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerstin Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Lauren Smith / Meredith Woodring
2025-05-28 · Paul, Jayme · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicki Crow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-09 · Paul, Jayme · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Winky James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-04-23 · Paul, Jayme · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cari Evers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-03-09 · Paul, Jayme · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Dittmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-02 · Paul, Jayme · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Dittmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-16 · Paul, Jayme · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
43.9%
29W–37L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova