← Search

Kim Ziegler

— year-end
79 matches · 38W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Ziegler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Martins Dames · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Candia Barry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Martins Dames · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Gilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · Martins Dames · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Candia Barry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Morrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Duong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Dupont Divas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Bragagnolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-19 · Dupont Divas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Minako Kobayashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-20 · Dupont Divas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hartnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-06-27 · Nicolson-Spring 18+ · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Cutrona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-06-20 · Nicolson-Spring 18+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Lucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-13 · Nicolson-Spring 18+ · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol McGurk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-30 · Nicolson-Spring 18+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Lucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
56.7%
17W–13L · 50.5% of games
4.5
38.5%
10W–16L · 44.3% of games
8.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 60.1% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer