← Search

Jennifer Viscosi

Wake Forest, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 75W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Viscosi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Ju.Johnson40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Beach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-09-02 · We.Bargoil40C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Gina Marlowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · We.Bargoil18C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Nadeen Baddar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-19 · As.McCollum18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Willard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-13 · Ju.Johnson40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-06 · Ju.Johnson40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Bargoil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · As.McCollum18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Cagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-05 · We.Bargoil40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Genevieve Daurity
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Ju.Brown18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juli Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · As.McCollum40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julee Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Ju.Brown18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juli Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-04 · As.McCollum18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Panebianco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
55.6%
30W–24L · 52% of games
3.5
41.1%
23W–33L · 47.5% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 54% of games
6.5
45.5%
15W–18L · 46.9% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
27 matches
#1 Singles
14%
23 matches
#2 Singles
11%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova