← Search

Barbara Timinskas

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 81W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barbara Timinskas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
L
Jennifer Moore / Amanda Lacoff
2026-09-02 · APlachco.8.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meghan Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-31 · APlachco.18C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Montague
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-30 · Ta.Parise18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shelly Kirkpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · APlachco.8.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristen Howering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · APlachco.18C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ana Plachco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Sa.Wood40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · APlachco.18C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cheryl Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-05 · Sa.Wood40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Culbreth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · APlachco.18C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cheryl Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-28 · MHoward-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-13 · APlachco-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Leib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-24 · MHoward-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miranda Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.5% of games
4.5
46.2%
18W–21L · 48.6% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
54%
47W–40L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert