← Search

Christie Peterson

Roswell, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 39W–26L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Christie Peterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
Mandy Borland / Jessica Smith
2026-06-15 · Wexford (Tina Poland)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · Wexford (Tina Poland)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carli Bouckaert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-28 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-01-28 · Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-16 · Wexford (Tina Poland)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lourdes Bove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-01-14 · Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-12-14 · Wexford (Tina Poland)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dede Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-22 · Wexford (Tina Poland)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Luna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-08 · Wexford (Tina Poland)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lourdes Bove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-06-15 · Wexford (Mary Beebe)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 56.2% of games
4.0
58.7%
27W–19L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova