← Search

Mary Elam Polk

— year-end
56 matches · 45W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mary Elam Polk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-09 · LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie LaLance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-02 · LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-26 · LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie LaLance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Frame
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-06 · Laroy/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassie Bourdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6
W
2026-07-16 · Laroy/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niki Delk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-1
W
2026-06-29 · Eubank/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tonia Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · Eubank/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassie Bourdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-27 · Hicks/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Collier Andress Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-22 · Frame/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Eubank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · Hicks/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Collier Andress Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-17 · Hicks/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Collier Andress Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
77.5%
31W–9L · 55.4% of games
7.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 73% of the time
#1 Doubles
73%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe