← Search

Eddie Blount

Durham, NC
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
90 matches · 44W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eddie Blount to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-09-09 · NBuckley-HR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Richard Bolduc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-08 · EBlount.55.8.5C-HR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Calhoun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-02 · NBuckley-HR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Niall Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-01 · EBlount.55.8.5C-HR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Calhoun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · NBuckley-HR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffrey Qualls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · CCouto-HR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Spearman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-2
W
2026-07-27 · CCouto-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Spearman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · CCouto-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Spearman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-02 · CCouto-HR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Feger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-19 · CCouto-HR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Benkowitz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · ELindblom-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Lindblom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · ELindblom-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Lindblom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 56.7% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 44.4% of games
8.5
50%
4W–4L · 49% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.4% of games
4.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 28.1% of games
8.0mixed
47.8%
11W–12L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King