← Search

Julie Spearman

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
253 matches · 168W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Spearman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history253 matches
L
2026-09-14 · KMabe-HR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Feger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-08 · CCouto-HR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Hsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-01 · CCouto-HR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaime Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-31 · KMabe-HR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carrie Couto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · KMabe-HR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Wyngaarden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · CCouto-HR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eddie Blount mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-2
W
2026-08-03 · KMabe-HR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kay Mabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · CCouto-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eddie Blount mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · CCouto-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eddie Blount mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-02 · EWyngaarden-HR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Couto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-16 · CCouto-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jon Post mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-09 · CCouto-HR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh MacIver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 71% of games
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 79.8% of games
3.5
83.3%
30W–6L · 59.6% of games
4.0
51.2%
44W–42L · 51.9% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.9% of games
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.4% of games
7.5
67.9%
38W–18L · 57.8% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.2% of games
3.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.5% of games
4.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
57 matches
#1 Singles
8%
21 matches
#2 Singles
8%
20 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert