← Search

Carolyn Labonia

Germantown, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 35W–4L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Carolyn Labonia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maryellen Tabor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maryellen Tabor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peyton Neal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · Brackett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabe LaBonia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Rebecca Brower / Blake Adams
2026-07-09 · Babcock/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · Brackett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Brackett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peyton Neal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-04 · Babcock/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-23 · Galdieri/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Craven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-03-03 · Galdieri/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Kelly Irvine
2025-11-19 · Galdieri/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-11-06 · Galdieri/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 66.3% of games
3.0
94.1%
16W–1L · 75.8% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 82.8% of games
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
9 matches
#2 Singles
23%
9 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams