← Search

Alejandro Andreotti

Ames, IA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 2W–12L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Alejandro Andreotti to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-04-03 · Carlyle/Miller · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-18 · Carlyle/Miller · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Carlyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-02 · Carlyle/Miller · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William (Ev) Cochrane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-11-24 · Carlyle/Miller · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Carlyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-04-13 · Pecharsky: Ames · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vitaly Pecharsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2024-03-16 · Pecharsky: Ames · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-17 · Pecharsky: Ames · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with William (Ev) Cochrane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-04 · Carlyle · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-20 · Pecharsky: Ames · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ronald Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-12-17 · Carlyle · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-12-16 · IA/Jha-Hanson/40&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2023-12-09 · IA/Jha-Hanson/40&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anil Jha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 21.9% of games
8.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#1 Singles
14%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams