← Search

Richard Heil

— year-end
137 matches · 64W–73L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Richard Heil to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-05-17 · Heil/Hanson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Torgerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · Heil/Hanson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dawn Ver Steeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-14 · Jha & Hanson: Genesis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Fisher Jr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-22 · Heil · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Bradfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-01 · Heil · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Brick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-01 · Heil/Hanson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dawn Ver Steeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-01-30 · Jha & Hanson: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ravindran Perumal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-12-14 · Heil · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Nikolas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-13 · Versteeg: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Willett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-31 · Versteeg: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronald Bradfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-18 · Versteeg: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-04 · Versteeg: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Micka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Teams66 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
20%
3W–12L · 41.9% of games
4.0
47.2%
17W–19L · 48.7% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 42.4% of games
8.0
60%
12W–8L · 54.9% of games
7.0mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
48.6%
17W–18L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
32 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams