← Search

Cindy Barnett

Lakeland, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 4W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Cindy Barnett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Sutton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Novick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-16 · Sutton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Teri McDowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · Sutton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teri McDowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-1
W
2026-03-07 · Sutton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Sutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-13 · Sutton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ana Paula Pereira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Carla Higgins / Debbie Bryant
2025-09-06 · Sutton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lucia de Freitas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-09-04 · Sutton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Sutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2025-03-29 · Sodini/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Sodini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-20 · Sodini/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Sodini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-06 · Sodini/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Thielemier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-17 · Lockard/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gwendolyn Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-03-09 · Sodini/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Thielemier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 75% of the time
#1 Doubles
75%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert