← Search

Hanna Sturgis

Chapel Hill, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 83W–64L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Hanna Sturgis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
W
2026-09-10 · TOC.Friddle · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Elder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-5
W
2026-09-03 · TOC.Friddle · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephannie Messina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · TOC.Thio · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karon Mertens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-20 · TOC.Thio · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carole Bobby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · ACP.Terjesen · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kati Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · KF.Reiser · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · TOC.Thio · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karon Mertens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Virginia Grau / Sarah Hall
2026-08-06 · TOC.Friddle · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Gilreath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Wilda Eade / Steve Clark
2026-08-05 · KF.Tapp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ron Jeffery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-07 · KF.Reiser · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-24 · KF.Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · KF.Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kati Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 56.7% of games
3.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 61.9% of games
3.5
43.2%
16W–21L · 51.8% of games
6.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 43.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
38.5%
10W–16L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
25 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova