← Search

Lisa Hackman

— year-end
30 matches · 8W–22L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Lisa Hackman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2022-10-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pam Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aleida van Den Bergh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Terri Shea / Susan Nixon
2022-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2022-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2022-02-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2022-01-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
Judy Banks / Ann Osuntokun
2022-01-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Lisa Nelson / Anne Jenson
2021-11-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lee Ann Lankton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2021-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aleida van Den Bergh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 41.4% of games
7.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 40.9% of games
8.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe