← Search

Sue Ann Kane

— year-end
19 matches · 5W–14L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Sue Ann Kane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2025-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen OBerg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2021-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Bevans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2021-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jen Andrisani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2021-05-22 · Penn Oaks · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Breslin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 6-2
L
2021-05-15 · Penn Oaks · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Kitze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-05-08 · Penn Oaks · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Kitze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2019-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Bilek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2019-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Bilek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Courtney Mcgovern / Carolyn Hurzeler
2019-09-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2019-09-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2019-09-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Teams2 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.7% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova