← Search

Dana Stout

Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 41W–49L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Dana Stout to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Bratton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Virginia Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-26 · Bratton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Darling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · Bratton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Savannah Nagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
Lynn Davis / Bill Whitmire
2026-06-27 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with RAYUDU KUMPATLA mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Picha/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Ellen Sisson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · Flesch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Flesch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Bratton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Cooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-02 · Picha/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Darling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-05-06 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jo Picha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jennifer Wright / Claire Fowler
2026-05-02 · Monistere/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Flesch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-27 · TerBurgh/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Rude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-23 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Palacio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 62.5% of games
3.5
48.9%
22W–23L · 51.5% of games
4.0
17.6%
3W–14L · 38.6% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 43.7% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer