← Search

Matthew Fitzsimmons

— year-end
54 matches · 25W–29L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Matthew Fitzsimmons to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-08-16 · MCP.Ratliff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Mi.Ratliff18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-09 · Mi.Ratliff18C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Todd Sprouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Testa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabe Jimenez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Chris Johnson / Charles Gordon
2026-05-21 · MCP.Ratliff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Francisco Burbano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-21 · Mi.Ratliff18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Ratliff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-21 · Mi.Ratliff18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Testa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-15 · Mi.Ratliff18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Sprouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Jack Moore / Jason Grunberg
2025-10-05 · Mi.Ratliff18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nick Zelano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-28 · Mi.Ratliff18C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pedro Loaiza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-08-24 · Mi.Ratliff18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pedro Loaiza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 59.8% of games
3.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 49% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.4% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova