← Search

Katherine Granbois

Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 21W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katherine Granbois to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Bender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcy Blitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-19 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sierra Hartmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-16 · Hempfield Penn Pals (Culp) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Marino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2025-10-26 · Hempfield Penn Pals (Culp) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francine Pommells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-03 · Hempfield Penn Pals (Culp) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Marino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-14 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-07-14 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-29 · Hempfield - Arters · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-20 · Hempfield - Arters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Arters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-08-25 · #3 Doubles · with Catherine Ingram championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 43.3% of games
4.0
33.3%
14W–28L · 44.7% of games
8.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.2% of games
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#1 Singles
25%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams