← Search

Brittini Thacker

Elizabethton, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 28W–22L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brittini Thacker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Janiszewski-Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barb Janiszewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Dirk DiSantis / Lenoire Lawing
2026-06-27 · Bunch/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Damon Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-5
W
Daniel Bogachek / Mary Beth Shults-kumar
2026-06-13 · Bunch/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Austin Herron mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-26 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Wenzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-14 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Shults-kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Linda Cowart / Jennie Fowler
2026-04-13 · Thacker/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Pencarinha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Jessica Taylor
2026-04-11 · Thacker/META · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-31 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Wenzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-30 · Thacker/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Jilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Wenzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-23 · Thacker/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Grammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-22 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Wenzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.4% of games
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 21.5% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.9% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.9% of games
3.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert