← Search

Lydia Pasteris

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 118W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lydia Pasteris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history215 matches
L
2026-09-13 · ACP.Lowrance · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-23 · ACP.Lowrance · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beate Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · TOC.Conzola · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-29 · TOC.Kempf · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Reiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Kelli Williams / Holly Atkinson
2026-04-28 · La.Triebert18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beate Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-20 · TOC.Kempf · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kari Barsness
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-16 · TOC.Hollett · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kati Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-11 · TOC.Kempf · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
Namita Lokare / Nicole Peterson
2026-04-07 · TOC.Kempf · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley McRae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-06 · TOC.Kempf · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Smita Shukla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · La.Triebert18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beate Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-26 · TOC.Hollett · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kati Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
69.2%
36W–16L · 57.6% of games
4.0
40.6%
26W–38L · 44.3% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 55.6% of games
7.5
61.1%
33W–21L · 52.7% of games
8.5
0%
0W–5L · 39.4% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
51 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert